logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.10.20 2017고합197
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On January 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment by the Cheongju District Court due to interference with business affairs, etc., and completed the execution of the said sentence in the Cheongju Prison on September 17, 2015.

[Criminal facts] The Defendant committed the following crimes in a state that the Defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to stimulative disorder, mental and behavioral disorder caused by alcohol use, etc.

1. On May 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) stolen the victim D (alias) located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheongju-si; (b) caused a theft of 1 Moco equivalent to 500 won at the market price in the E store operated by this E store.

2. On May 2017, the Defendant: (a) placed a small amount of tobacco equivalent to KRW 1,500 in the market value of KRW 1,500 in a liquor and the market value of KRW 4,500 in the market value under the influence of alcohol at a place, such as paragraph (1) of this Article; and (b) placed a tobacco equivalent to KRW 4,500 in the account account account to the victim D (tentative name) who is a female victim, to have the following money.

The victim attempted to deliver the damaged goods by spreading the victim in such a way as to inflict heavy influence on the victim by causing harm to the victim's body or obstructing the operation of convenience stores as if he/she were to inflict harm on the victim's body or interfere with the operation of convenience stores, but the victim is required to report to the police.

In other words, there was an attempted escape with the damaged articles as they are.

3. The Defendant, at around 12:50 on June 11, 2017, attempted to keep a small amount of KRW 4,000 in total market value sold under the influence of alcohol at a place, such as Paragraph 1 of Paragraph 1 of the same Article, and the Defendant, who is an employee, calculated the Victim F, by taking the same as it is, is defective that the Defendant would make it difficult for the Victim F to calculate the amount, and that the Defendant would make the Victim F, who is an employee, to reduce the amount “on the basis of no money.”

The brupted flusium, “Choe .............” Hab the victim was fluored, such as fluoring the victim’s body or interfering with the operation of convenience stores.

Accordingly, the defendant, as seen above, was delivered the damaged articles from the victim who frightened the victim.

arrow