A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 6, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) on and around 02:15, 2016, driven a 5 km car B from the day near the Yong-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Pungpo-si, Gaun-si, Gabun-si, Gabun-si, and 369 km from the day near the Yong-si, Changwon-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-ro, Mapo-ro, Mapo-ro,

2. On February 6, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, such as being under the influence of alcohol while driving the said vehicle at the front of his/her parliamentary death at his/her right angle on the road at the right angle on February 6, 2016. The Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, such as being under the influence of alcohol such as being under the influence of alcohol reduction reaction, smelling on the face of alcohol, smelling on the face.

Although there is a reasonable reason to designate a person, the police officer of the Mapo-gu Police Station C District Department requested the police officer D to comply with a drinking test, the police officer's refusal was arrested as a current offender.

Since then, the defendant was requested from around 02:44 of the same day to respond to the alcohol testing four times from around 30 minutes in the above C District, but did not comply with it without justifiable grounds.

3. Around 02:20 on February 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a current offender for the same reasons as indicated in paragraph 2 on the road in front of Masan on the road in front of Masan; (b) but did not get off the said vehicle; (c) the police officer affiliated with the Msan Police Station C District Group in the Msan Central Police Station attempted to bring the Defendant out of the vehicle by attaching the Defendant’s bridge; (d) the E’s face level in drinking, and the breast part in drinking, three times.

As above, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning traffic control by police officers, prevention of traffic hazards, prevention of crimes, suppression and investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement protocol of E prepared by the police;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. In the case of an investigation report (in the case of refusal of measurement of drinking alcohol, a copy of the register of use of measuring instruments for drinking alcohol), the attached photograph of refusal to measure drinking, and the register of use of measuring instruments for drinking alcohol;