beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for four months.
However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A served as the chairperson in charge of the business of the Chain Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) from December 1, 2013 to October 31, 2014, and Defendant B served as an employee who prepares tender documents from July 201 to F.
1. On February 2, 2014, Defendant A’s business with respect to the fabrication of public document forgeryF participated in the bidding related to the selection of guard company of the Seo-gu G apartment complex in Yongsan-gu, Seoyang-gu, Busan, Seoyang-gu. In that process, Defendant A had confirmed that the industrial accident insurance rate of F was higher than that of the competitor and had the document submitted at will to obtain a successful bid.
Accordingly, at around February 2014, Defendant A instructed Defendant B to change the industrial accident insurance premium rate in the name of the head of the Labor Welfare Service in Geumcheon-gu Seoul (H and 16 Dong 318) from “7.6” to “6.0” under the name of the head of the Labor Welfare Service in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Seoul, to “6.0”; Defendant B, at his own discretion, prepared “the notice of decision on the industrial accident insurance rate in 2014” and written the industrial accident insurance premium rate in “6.0”.
As a result, the Defendants forged “the notice of decision on industrial accident insurance rate” in the name of the head of the Seoul Gwanak branch office of the Labor Welfare Service, Seoul, which is an official document without authority for the purpose of exercising their authority.
2. On February 2014, the Defendants conspired with the above G Apartment Management Office to submit the “Notice of Determination of Industrial Accident Insurance Rate in 2014” in the name of the head of the Seoul Gwanak-gu branch office of the Labor Welfare Service, which is a forged official document, to the employees in charge of the said management office in the bidding document, and exercised it.
3. On February 25, 2014, the Defendants who interfere with their duties are the guard company from the victim G apartment occupants representative meeting by forging and using “Notice of Determination of Industrial Accident Insurance Rate 2014,” which is an official document at the G apartment management office around G apartment around February 25, 2014.