logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2017.05.30 2017고단157
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in other Acts, no person shall lend any access medium with the receipt, request or promise of compensation.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in the vicinity of the Shindong-dong Sympo-dong on September 23, 2016, borrowed a physical card to be used by the sports soil company by telephone from a person who is not his/her name, only if he/she lends the physical card to one hundred thousand won per day.

“In receipt of a proposal to the purport, the Kwikset Service Articles who agreed to receive KRW 100,000 in return for the lending of the check between the person without name and the person with no name, and leased one copy of the check to the company bank account in the name of the Defendant to the Kwikset Service Articles who sent the name without name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. C’s statement;

1. A certificate of transfer details;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on bank response data;

1. Article 49 of the Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 49 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which punishment is selected, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a case where the defendant receives a consideration and lends a medium of access to electronic financial transactions, which may infringe on the safety and reliability of electronic financial transactions as well as social criticism as it may be abused as a means of crime, such as telephone financial company, singing, etc., and the defendant's transfer of access media actually used for secondary crimes is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case against his mistake, there is no benefit acquired by the defendant due to the crime of this case, there is no record that the defendant was punished for the same crime, and there is no other means of character, character, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and means of the crime.

arrow