logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.12.14 2017누71040
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows. The court's explanation of this case is as follows: "no consultation" in the second 14th sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance; and "no consultation" in the third 19th sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, other than adding the following contents under the 3th 19th sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, it is identical to the part concerning the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2

(C) The Plaintiff asserted that “The Egypt Government is trying to arrest on the ground that he participated in a democratization movement for the release of B” in this court. However, in that the Plaintiff stated that “B participated in an assembly ascertaining the B’s non-suspect disposition at the time of refugee interview,” it is difficult to believe the above statement as it is, and there is no evidence to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s above assertion.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow