A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 23, 2017, the injured Defendant suffered injury on the part of the victim D (V, 46 years of age) in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and the part of the victim D (F, 46 years of age) who demanded the victim to present his/her identification card to the Defendant. On the other hand, the injured Defendant suffered injury on the part of the inner section and the part of the examination, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment on the face of the victim.

2. On November 23, 2017, at around 01:50, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at the “E main store” as stated in the foregoing paragraph 1., the Defendant assaulted the police slope G’s slope grouped by the police officer of the police station in Daegu, who was called upon with the notification of 112, to ascertain the circumstances of the instant case and to make the Defendant file a petition, and assaulted the G’s face continuously on the hand with the said G’s lives.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. An injury diagnosis certificate (D);

1. A photograph of the suspected victim's damage;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the place of F District Work;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. In light of the fact that a crime that interferes with the execution of official duties for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is bad in the nature of the crime, failure to agree with the victim of the crime, etc., there is a need to strictly punish the defendant.

However, in full view of all the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant acknowledges and reflects his mistake, the first offender, the circumstances of the crime, the degree of the crime, and the age of the defendant, the sentence is ordered as ordered.