beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.
The defendant pays 317,740,000 won to D who is an applicant for compensation.
The above order shall be.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From around December 26, 2010 to around December 26, 2010, the Defendant imported the Mereper of “Mereh” for young children in Japan with the trade name of “G” from the Young-si Suwon District F, and sold it to domestic Mereper retailers.
1. On November 25, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant would import and supply the diapers upon deposit of the diapers upon deposit of the diapers.”
However, as seen above, the Defendant, while running a low-priced distribution business as mentioned above, had a cumulative amount of three billion won, and had an obligation to return money to the investors in the Defendant’s business, 400 million won or more, and had not been paid the amount of low-priced which was already imported and supplied. In addition, since the Defendant had been in mind to start a new life from the Republic of Korea to the United States, the Defendant left the Republic of Korea and was in mind to the Republic of Korea, and there was no intention or ability to supply it to the victims by importing the low-priced with the above payment, which was already received by the victim in the form of “low-priced” or “low-priced”, even if it was intended to pay for the debt or use it as settlement expenses in the United States.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received a total of KRW 123,50,00 from the victim to December 27, 2010, and received a total of KRW 123,50,000 from November 25, 2010 to December 27, 2010 by the same method as shown in [Attachment Table 1-62] from November 25, 2010 to December 27, 2010, received a total of KRW 3,648,40,60 from 12 victims under the pretext of return.
2. Around December 2010, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant would pay the price to the victim by asking the victim I to the said G Office.”
However, the defendant is accumulated as stated in the above Paragraph 1.