logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2020.04.08 2019고단2439
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[2019 Highest 2439] On July 4, 2019, the Defendant searched “low grade loans” on the Internet B website, and contacted the Defendant by reporting the advertisement posted by the non-member of his/her name, and then making loans from the above non-member of his/her name to the above company as if he/she works for the company bitcoin in the face of sending the bitcoin card and security cards connected to the account.” On the same day, the Defendant sent the bit card connected to the account in the name of the Defendant to the above non-member of his/her name by using a bit phone that is linked to the account in the name of the Defendant at home company where it is impossible to identify the trade name in the name of the bitcoin at the same time.

As such, the Defendant promised to receive compensation and lent the means of access for electronic financial transactions.

[200 highest 402] On August 19, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court’s net support on August 19, 2016. From the same support on March 14, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution.

1. On January 15, 2020, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) driving a motor vehicle without registration at a section of about 300 meters from the front of the E apartment at the time of drinking to the front road of the same time, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.110% of the blood alcohol level without obtaining a driver’s license at around 03:03 on January 15, 2020.

2. The owner of a motor vehicle violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance, but the defendant operated a non-registered motor vehicle without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

[2019 Highest 2439]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A deposit receipt and a financial information return (2020 highest 402);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents (1), and (2);

1. Sites and photographs of the traffic accident;

1. A report on the statement of the executive status of an employee;

arrow