logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.09.26 2017고단2684
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, he/she shall be punished by a fine of two million won, respectively.

Defendant

B, C, and D respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【2017 Highest 2684 【Defendant A” was in charge of the operation of the H game room located in Ulsan-gu G, Ulsan-gu, where the monetary amount was invested from F, and Defendant C and D performed duties such as managing customers and exchanging them during the day. Defendant C and D, as night employees, performed duties such as accepting customers, exchanging, cleaning, etc. in the game room.

Defendants in collusion with F and the same year from June 30, 2017

7. By the end of 20.20, Defendant A and Defendant B were set up in the above H game room, and provided 40 guest with the Paris game machine on the day they obtain points according to the animal on the screen when they were put in money. At night, Defendant C and D were permanently stationed in the game room and at night, Defendant C and C were permanently stationed in the game room, and customers were converted to 10,000 won per 10,000 won, and exchange the remainder of the restricted amount to 10% (1,000 won) of the exchange fee.

As a result, the Defendants in collusion with F for the purpose of returning points obtained through the use of game water.

【2017 Highest 2966】

1. Defendant A in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving a I car rental car.

Defendant

A On February 25, 2017, the entrance was made bypassing from the edge of the alley-distance from K Et in the south-guJ of Ulsan-gu to the main road.

At the time, Defendant A was at night, and Defendant A had access from the alleyway, and thus, Defendant A had a duty of care to prevent accidents by properly manipulating the front left and right, and accurately manipulating the steering gear and brakes.

Nevertheless, Defendant A neglected to enter the front road to the first lane of the main road, and due to the negligence of entering the first lane of the main road of the main road, Defendant A received the front part of the main part of the Man L (30 years old) driving, which was driven by Defendant A, the front part of the main part of the Mann LW car driving.

After all, Defendant A is the mother of the above occupational negligence.

arrow