logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.03.30 2017고단187
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person driving a cuss car as a duty in B.

1. On February 18, 2008, the Defendant was under the influence of a fine of one million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and on September 1, 2009, the same court was sentenced to a fine of two million won for the same crime and sentenced to a fine of two hundred and five hundred and five hundred thousand won for the same crime, but on December 15, 2016, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of 0.73% alcohol out of blood alcohol in the first apartment parking lot in the Daegu-gu Newdong-gu, Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong, the first apartment parking lot located in around 16:42 on December 15, 2016, from about 200 meters to about 88 new high schools at the same rate, from around 200 meters to about 0.73% from the blood alcohol level.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) was driving a vehicle above the above time at the above time, leading to the direction of the school, such as a lower rate, from the apartment room in which the new high school located in Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong, 8-ro, and the rear way behind the new high school.

At the same time, there was a motor vehicle parked in the front of the fire-fighting road, and thus, a person driving a motor vehicle as his duties had a duty of care to prevent the accident by driving the motor vehicle while living well before and after the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with as it is, and is proceeding before mathing, a victim C ( South, 57 tax) who stops on the vehicle due to the vehicle.

D The back part of the passenger vehicle was shocked by the front part of the Defendant vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the injury of the victim C by occupational negligence on the part of the victim C, the injury of the affected vehicle E (V, 59 years of age) by the 10-day clock, and the injury of the clock and the sleep of the slick part, which requires treatment for about 10 days, and the injury of the click and the slick of the slick part, which require treatment for about 10 days to the same passenger F (V, 33 years of age).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver in charge;

arrow