logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.03.30 2016고단6
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Each request for compensation order of this case shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Crimes against victims D;

A. On September 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to D that “F” in the “F” store operated by the Defendant in Yacheon-gu, Ocheon-gu, Ocheon-gu, U.S., the Defendant would have obtained a loan to have the victimized party complete the payment of the her husband’s debts. For the two-month period, the Defendant provided a guarantee to the injured party, she provided a face-to-face, her face-to-face, her face-to-face, and her face-to-face, and received KRW 70,00,000 after the two-month period. In so doing, the Defendant would make a full payment.”

However, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the money to the lending company even though the victim has guaranteed the defendant's loan.

Nevertheless, on September 29, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 3,000,000 from E-won Loan Capital Co., Ltd., a loan from the victim on the ground of the victim as the guarantor, and made the victim bear the guarantee obligation, and received a total of KRW 21,00,000 from the lending companies on seven occasions, such as the attached Table 1 of the List of Crimes, and did not pay the victim as the guarantor, thereby having the victim bear the guarantee obligation equivalent to the above amount, and thereby having the victim obtain the financial profit equivalent to the same amount.

2) On October 31, 2014, the Defendant issued a letter of guarantee to the victim D at the place described in the foregoing paragraph (1).

In order to delete the records and obtain a certificate of full payment, on the other hand, the victim made a loan in the name of the victim by stating that it would be possible for the victim to obtain a loan in the name of the victim by stating that it would be possible for the victim to obtain a certificate of full payment for the guaranteed case, and then, the victim made a false statement to the victim, “The victim would request a physical card to be withdrawn from the loan to the Don Account if the loan would be withdrawn.”

However, even if the defendant receives the above money, he did not have any intention or ability to lend the money to the victim by using it in full.

The defendant is a national bank of the victim on November 4, 2014 from the victim's damage.

arrow