beta
Text
Defendant
A A shall be punished by fine for negligence of KRW 7,000,000 and by imprisonment for one year.
Defendant
A The above fine shall be imposed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who was sentenced to four years in the Incheon District Court on June 20, 208 to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Customs Act, and completed the execution of the sentence and operated the Incheon Vocational Training Prison on August 6, 201, and Defendant B was a person who had been working for F from August 201 to August 201 as a person who had been working for F.E.
Defendant
A was punished for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. (thief) as seen above, with regard to a crime that stolen a vehicle and fabricated the documents as if it were normal scrapped, and subsequently, he was able to think that G living together from July 2006 to August 7, 2007 deducted his own property, and that G had an awareness of the fact that G conspiredd with the investigation agency at the time of the crime.
On the other hand, the E head office was in a very large relationship with H and the operation of the juncule ju, but it was within the condition of the right to operate the juncule ju, etc., and the Defendant A proposed that H would be punished as if he were an accomplice when he provided the above information with G. Accordingly, the Defendant B had the intention to be punished as well as the intention to have the Defendant A investigate into G, and the Defendant A had also accepted it and conspired with the Defendant A to give false information in sequence.
Defendant
B, around December 2012, at the second floor office of Kimpo-si I in Kimpo-si, a false accusation was made in the name of the defendant for the purpose of having H receive criminal punishment by using a computer.
Of the accusation, the part on H in the accusation was “Defendant 1 as a director of the (ju) E Scrapping Chapter at the time of the instant case, and the beginning of the case was commenced from Defendant 1 H.
H was also a ship of his own ship, and (State) the actual.