[Defendant A] The defendant is punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, from July 2008 to February 2, 2016, was employed by Defendant A as a person who works for life contract and was in charge of controlling on the street in transit of the Gu office’s economic doctrine in the former city F from July 2008 to February 2016.

A. The Defendant stated in the written application for permission to amend the Bill of Indictment on October 24, 2017 as “ around April 2015,” but this appears to be a clerical error in the “ around May 2015” (178 pages, 359 page of the investigation record), and there is no risk of undermining the Defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense, thereby ex officio correcting it and recognizing it.

At the entertainment station located in H at Jeonju-si, there was a request from Nowon-si merchant B to the effect that he is able to look at the regulatory convenience, such as the provision of information and enforcement regulations on the street store, and received approximately KRW 240,000,000,000,000,000 won, etc.

B. On June 2015, the Defendant received a solicitation from the above B to the effect that “I” entertainment points located in H at the Jeonju-si, Jeonju-si, to the effect that it changed the regulatory convenience, such as the provision of information and enforcement of crackdowns, and received approximately KRW 2.50,000 won, and the Defendant was provided.

(c)

On July 2015, the Defendant received an offer of approximately KRW 330,000,00,000 from the said B to the effect that it changed the regulatory convenience, such as the provision of information and crackdown on the street occupation, etc., from “K,” located in theJ of Jeonju-si.

(d)

On August 8, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 100,000 of the cost of sexual traffic from L around the Jeonju to the effect that the regulatory convenience, such as the provision of information and crackdown on the street occupation, was changed from L around the same week.

2. Defendant B made an illegal solicitation to M on a total of four occasions at the date, time, place, as described in paragraph 1, and paid a total of 920,000 won or delivered cash.

Accordingly, the defendant made an illegal solicitation to a person who handles another's business and offered property or property benefits.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1]

1. Each legal statement of witness B and N;

1. Defendant B