beta
Text
1. The defendant and each of the above costs of KRW 169,780,314 against the plaintiff A, KRW 161,363,714 against the plaintiff B, and KRW 2,500,000 against the plaintiff C and D, respectively.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. As of February 21, 2014, the relationship between the parties (1) E (F) was a student attending the third year of H high schools located in Seo-gu Busan Metropolitan City as of February 21, 2014, and the Plaintiff A and B are parents of E, and Plaintiff C and D are the same students of E.
(2) The Defendant is a juristic person established by the Superintendent of the Busan Metropolitan City Office of Education to implement a school safety mutual aid project, and the principal of each school, such as kindergartens, elementary schools, high schools, etc. in Busan Metropolitan City, shall be a subscriber, and shall be paid mutual aid benefits for various
B. (1) On February 21, 2014, E entered a third floor of 14:00 and was used in the future as a part of solving physiological phenomenon.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). From 16:50 to 16:50 to the end of the self-learning, J, and K found E used in the toilets due to the lack of E and known to the principal of H high school. At around 17:02, Busan Central and Busan Central Fire Fighting Center, which received a report call, arrived at H high school and sent E in the state of heart stop and respiratory stop condition to the emergency room of the East Asia University Hospital.
(2) At around 17:18, E (hereinafter “the deceased”) arrived at the emergency room of the East Asia University Hospital, but died, and the person directly in charge of the autopsy on the body of the deceased is a physical appearance based on his own tax, and the cause of the death is “presumpting”.
(3) The Plaintiff asserted that the deceased’s death constitutes a school safety accident that occurred during educational activities, and claimed the Defendant to pay the deduction benefits (bereaved benefits) to the Defendant. However, on April 21, 2014, the Defendant decided to pay the deduction benefits (the payment of consolation benefits is determined based on Article 40-2 of the Act on the Prevention of and Compensation for Accidents at School) and Article 20-2 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act (the payment of consolation benefits) and notified the Plaintiff A.
Accordingly, the plaintiff A is dissatisfied with this.