logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.05.16 2017나60222
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Around 8:30 on March 28, 2013, the Plaintiff’s accident occurred that conflict with D Ecoos car (hereinafter “Ecoos car”) while the Plaintiff was driving on the left-hand turn on the road in front of Busan, Daegu, Daegu, Busan, and the left-hand turn.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

After the accident investigation process of this case 1, the plaintiff was driving without taking special measures for the occurrence of the accident, and the driver of Ecubs visited the transportation survey team of the Busan Coast Guard to report the occurrence of the accident.

Criminal facts

The Plaintiff, while driving an urban bus and driving a two-lane in Busan Metropolitan City, was driven by a new city along the two-lanes from the new city to the marine traffic beach, and the part on the front part of the ecoo vehicle driving on the right side of the ecoo vehicle in the first lane due to the Plaintiff’s breach of the safety driving duty.

As a result, the plaintiff suffered injury to the driver of Ecoos by negligence in the course of business, such as salt dynasty, tensions, etc. requiring two-day medical treatment.

In the investigation into an escape, the Plaintiff stated that the bus driven by the Plaintiff was shocked by the victim and left the vehicle without taking any measure, or that the Plaintiff was unable to recognize the fact of the accident; that the passenger could not be aware of the fact of the accident even if several passengers are aboard the bus in the black video submitted by the Plaintiff; that at the time of the accident, the Plaintiff is driving daily without any particular response; that at the time of the accident, the Plaintiff is unable to listen to the light of the view that the Plaintiff was aware of the accident and there was no evidence or evidence to deem that the Plaintiff left the scene.

The investigator's opinion recognizes that the plaintiff shocked Ecuas vehicles.

arrow