Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. From around 19:00 on March 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was drunk in the E entertainment tavern of the victim’s E entertainment tavern operated under the Guro-si, the Defendant: (b) expressed the victim’s desire to be “ception year, schep” from around 21:00 of the same day on the ground that the Defendant was not aware of the remaining money already received; (c) avoided disturbance over about 30 minutes of the victim’s main business by forcing the customer who had been in other main points of the said week to undergo alcohol and talking; and (d) obstructed the victim’s main business by force.

2. On March 26, 2014, at around 22:36, the Defendant received 112 declarations (No. 2734) that the Defendant spawn the spawn at the same place as paragraph (1) at the same time as paragraph (1) and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of the reported case by assaulting the Defendant’s chest by assaulting the Defendant’s chest by assaulting the Defendant’s 112 spawn, thereby obstructing the police officer’s lawful performance of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning G and D;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing a business license;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the choice of punishment for a criminal offense show the attitude that each Defendant, who is selected to impose a fine, recognizes his or her mistake in mind, has not any history of criminal punishment other than the punishment imposed for a fine of KRW 300,000 as a criminal offense in 2013, the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties is relatively small, and the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties is not relatively small, and the alcohol seems to lead to each of the crimes of this case by contingency, and the defendant is deemed to have been aware of to a certain extent through the detention period exceeding