The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning for the appeal (five months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant recognized the crime of this case, the amount of damage is not high, the defendant is often punished as a sentence by a criminal punishment of several times, and even if he was punished by the same kind of fraud, the crime of this case is extremely poor by committing the crime again during the period of a repeated crime of the same criminal record, and the risk of recidivism is high, and there is no special circumstance or circumstance that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the judgment below.

In addition, given that the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the instant records and arguments, such as the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is groundless.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.