logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.06.28 2017가합12747
근로에관한 소송
Text

1. The plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 2, 2011, the Plaintiff entered Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) and was recommended on November 19, 2014. The Defendant Company is a company whose main business is logistics business and steel business, and Defendant C and D were working as the team leader of each general affairs and operation of the Defendant Military Branch.

B. On October 31, 2014, the Defendant Company received a written petition from the Seo Young special lecture Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Seo Young special lecture”) to the effect that “the Plaintiff incurred losses due to interference with the business of Seo Young special lectures in the Defendant Company, etc.” The Seo Young special lecture stated the receiver of the petition as “the F Company C Head of the F Company,” but at the time both the Defendant C and the Plaintiff were affiliated with the Defendant Company.

Defendant D had an interview with the Plaintiff on the same day.

C. The Plaintiff was dismissed from office in the Defendant Company through the above interview, and was absent from office on November 3, 2014, and the Defendant Company sent a content-certified mail to the effect that the Plaintiff would return to work on November 4, 2014, and that the content-certified mail would have arrived at the Plaintiff on the following day, but the Plaintiff did not continue to work.

From November 11, 2014, the Plaintiff presented his intention of resignation to E by the head of the Si/Gun/Gu team team team leader of the Defendant company from November 1, 2014 and presented his/her intention of resignation on the condition

E. On November 17, 201, the Plaintiff appeared to work again on November 17, 201, and on November 19, 2014, the Defendant D and the Plaintiff agreed to resign on the condition that “the Defendant Company would pay the Plaintiff a six-month salary and handle the recommended position so that it would receive unemployment benefits” (hereinafter “the resignation agreement in this case”), and the Defendant Company’s letter of commitment that “No forms of civil, criminal, criminal, accusation, accusation, and prosecution against the Defendant Company and its executives and employees shall be raised against any form of the Defendant Company,” including a written promise.

arrow