logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.04.29 2015고단1438
공공단체등위탁선거에관한법률위반
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for 8 months, by imprisonment for 4 months, and by a fine of 2 million won.

2. The defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A A was elected by going to the election of the head of HF agricultural cooperative, which was implemented on March 11, 2015, and Defendant B was a member of the said cooperative, and Defendant C is a member of the said cooperative, and Defendant C is a member of the said cooperative with interest at all times.

1. Defendants A and B conspired to offer money and other valuables to the said I, on the ground that I, who is a member of the interest of the president of the HFF and the principal of the HF, is not good between the Defendants A and B, and thus would have an adverse impact on the election of the president of the union.

Accordingly, Defendant B provided KRW 100,000,000 in cash in relation to the election of president of HFF, which will be carried out on March 11, 2015, at around January 10, 2015, Defendant B appealed J and I’s house in operation 103.

Accordingly, Defendants conspired to make contributions during the contribution-restricted period (from September 21, 2014 to March 10, 2015).

2. The Defendants jointly committed the crimes of Defendant A and Defendant C offered cash to the above I as set forth in the preceding paragraph, but conspired to offer gifts, not cash, not cash, etc. to be returned.

Accordingly, Defendant C found at the above I’s house around January 28, 2015, and provided the above I’s wife K with a small gift set of amounting to KRW 300,000,000 while complaining for the above I’s support.

Accordingly, Defendants conspired to make contributions during the contribution-restricted period (from September 21, 2014 to March 10, 2015).

3. Unless Defendant A’s election campaign period (from February 25, 2015 to March 10, 2015) is in place, no election campaign shall be conducted against Defendant A.

Nevertheless, on January 1, 2015, the Defendant sent a text message to 206 members M et al. to the effect that “the life of No. 2, who retired from H agricultural cooperative and was asked for loyalty and guidance to live together with neighbors,” and sent the same text message to 1,515 members from around that time to February 25, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant carried out an election campaign when it is not an election campaign period.

Summary of Evidence

1...

arrow