1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and publication - B - Public announcement made by the Daejeon Regional Construction and Management Office ( May 6, 2010): Daejeon Regional Construction and Management Office;

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on November 20, 2014 - Details of the ruling: The Plaintiff filed a petition with the Defendant for a ruling on expropriation of the hot spring hole installed in the area of 1,401 square meters in Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do (hereinafter “instant hot spring hole”), and the Defendant filed an application for a ruling on expropriation of the instant hot spring hole with the Central Land Tribunal. However, the instant hot spring hole is dismissed on the ground that its usage has been abolished or its function has been lost and there is no economic value. - An appraisal corporation: a certified public appraisal corporation state, a stock company, a future appraisal corporation (based on recognition), a public appraisal corporation, a stock company, and a new appraisal corporation (based on recognition), and the purport of the entire pleadings and the entire arguments.

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. Although the plaintiff's assertion should be compensated for obstacles to the hot spring hole of this case owned by the plaintiff, the defendant excluded the hot spring hole of this case from the object of compensation by deeming that the use of the hot spring hole of this case was abolished or its function has been lost and there is no economic value. The defendant must pay the plaintiff the reasonable compensation and the interest for the delay.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

C. Article 75(1) of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects (hereinafter “Land Compensation Act”) provides that compensation for buildings or obstacles shall be provided in principle for expenses incurred in their relocation. However, a case where the relocation of a building, etc. is difficult or its relocation makes it impossible to use the building, etc. for its original purpose due to such relocation (Article 36(2) of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act). Article 36(2) of the same Act provides that the use of obstacles, etc. is abolished or its function is lost (Article 1).