Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On June 21, 2017, the defendant was divorced from the victim B (53 years and women).

On August 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 14:30 around 14:30 around 2017, 369, Gan-si, Gan-si, Gan-si, Kakn-si, Kakn-si, Kakn-si, Kakn-si, the above victim to the Kakn-si, and distributed the property.

While the Defendant demanded the consolidation of rulings to the victim several times in the process of being going to the above Mineyang registry, the said victim, on the ground that the said victim would be bad by disregarding and refusing his or her horses, operated the vehicle on the face of the truth by “Dro, rash, and so on” and operating the vehicle on the face of the margin.

The Defendant, despite the demand of the victim to lower the vehicle, laid down the door and windows of the vehicle, and improved the back acid in the E Village in lightyang city so that the victim could not get off the vehicle, thereby placing the victim under confinement for about 30 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to B

1. Relevant Article 276 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime, Article 276 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant committed assault against the said victim on August 1, 2017, for the same reasons as the above facts constituting the crime, on the grounds that the Defendant was in the back acid located in the E Village around 15:00 on August 1, 2017, she saw the breath of the victim B (53 taxes and inn) into a breath, she skes three times in a breath, thereby making the victim’s left breath of the breath, and her breath of the b

2. Since the above facts charged constitute a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, a public prosecution cannot be instituted against the clearly expressed intent of the victim pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

In this regard, the agreement that the victim B does not want to be punished against the defendant is made on October 26, 2017 after the prosecution of this case.