logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.29 2015고정4606
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a news reporter with D and E, and from around 2013, the Defendant operates the Internet portal site with F’s Blobation from the Internet portal site.

A. At around 10:35 on June 18, 2015, the Defendant, using a computer at the D office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G B Dong 821-822, connected to the Internet NAV B H by the Defendant, and then, as the title “DTV only I, the J Chairman of the JI company, and the end of the desire, is located in another place within the truth of the JW Chairman of the I company in this case.”

From the beginning of the Dosan to the Kim Jong-si, the Do governor operated a fish farm owned by the I company, and raised diverse domestic animals from the eggs produced by the eggs to the Do governor and the Do governor.

From time to time, the I company started to produce the books directly.

The letter "I am back," and "I am back, I am of the J Chairman and I am of the Myang farm owned by I am of the Agricultural Company."

I did not have a direct nutrition farm under the ownership of the I, and there are chickenss that have been raised as well as the chill that has produced the eggs beginning from the solar chickens, and that have been raised.

The Do substitute posts news coverage videos with the content that "I have started to set up a farm at any time, raise the chickens, and supply the eggs."

In fact, however, there is no fact that the I company in the operation of the victim J produces and sells the limits directly.

Accordingly, the defendant abused the victim's reputation by disclosing false information through information and communications networks with a view to slandering the victim.

B. On June 18, 2015, around 10:57, at the same place as the above Paragraph 1, the Defendant posted a sign and video of the same content as the above Paragraph 1 on the Internet homepage N on the Internet homepage as “Authorization to the end of I Company J Chairman and the end of desire.”

This is the defendant.

arrow