1. As to the Plaintiff’s 1,382 square meters of Gyeonggi-gun B Miscellaneous land, the Defendant shall make a registration office of the Jungcheon District Court on December 1995.

1. Basic facts

A. The Land Survey Book (The assessment year: 1913) prepared with respect to the “Yacheon-gun C” during the period of the title holder’s Japanese occupation, is registered as the owner of the land indicated in the disposition (hereinafter “instant land”).

The above D was integrated with Fri and Gri in accordance with the consolidation of administrative districts in 1914, and was incorporated into Hri.

나. 원고의 선대와 상속관계 원고의 남편인 I의 조부(祖父)인 J은 본적이 ‘경기 연천군 K’였는데, 1923. 12. 30. 사망하여 장남인 L이 호주 및 재산상속(1/2 지분 이상)을 하였고, L이 1972. 5. 1. 사망하여 그의 아들인 I가 그 재산 중 일부를 상속하였으며, I가 1996. 7. 25. 사망하여 처인 원고가 그의 재산 중 일부를 상속하였다.

C. As to the Defendant’s land of this case, the registration of preservation of ownership in the Defendant’s name (hereinafter “registration of preservation of ownership”) was completed under the title No. 11896, which was received on December 9, 1995 by the Jung-gu District Court registry office of the Republic of Korea.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including each number), Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The following circumstances are revealed by comprehensively taking account of the facts acknowledged prior to the identity of the Plaintiff’s ship and the name of Chinese father of the Plaintiff’s husband, E and the Plaintiff’s husband’s husband’s identity as “M,” and ② “Dri” in which the Plaintiff’s husband resided as “Hri” due to the consolidation of administrative districts in 1914, the permanent domicile of the Plaintiff’s husband’s husband’s husband’s domicile as “K,” and “Dri” (N=O) was located in the original domicile of the Plaintiff’s husband’s husband’s domicile as “K,” and “Gri” was expressed as “the old location of the R area located inside the Pwest,” and “Fri” (hereinafter “Fri”) is also expressed as “the permanent domicile of the Plaintiff’s husband’s husband’s domicile.”