logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2016.06.02 2016고정78
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine of five million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 26, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of eight months of imprisonment for fraud in the Suwon Franchising method, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 20, 2013. On April 10, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor and four years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. on April 18, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 18, 2014, on August 30, 2014, upon being sentenced to two months of imprisonment with prison labor for interference with bidding from the Suwon Franchising method sources, and on April 11, 2014, the judgment became final and conclusive on September 27, 2014 by being sentenced to two months of imprisonment with prison labor for breach of trust from the Suwon Franchising method sources to imprisonment with prison labor on April 11, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 13, 2013, 2014.

[2016 High 78] On July 28, 2012, the Defendant paid 95 million won to the victim E at a coffee shop in front of D elementary schools located in Pakistan on July 28, 2012, to the effect that “in the case of Pakistan, the 90-scale childcare facilities within the 16BL A.S. Round loan loan loaned in the P16BL A. Sinju City, would be awarded a successful bid through a bid at the representative meeting of occupants. If the Defendant is unable to obtain a successful bid, the Defendant would return the said money.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to cause the victim to be awarded a successful tender in bidding procedures for childcare facilities, such as the criminal complaint has already been filed by many similar cases.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) immediately delivered KRW 3 million from the victim as the down payment; and (c) obtained delivery of KRW 27 million as the intermediate payment on August 6, 2012; and (d) acquired KRW 30 million in total from the victim.

[2016 Highest 225] Defendant and F receive money from many people on the pretext of allowing them to receive childcare center operation rights in around 2008.

arrow