Defendant

A and B Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of ten thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

C The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of the FF who manufactures and sells Korean classical instruments, and the defendant B and C are farmers, and G are those who work as certified architect assistant at the H architect office.

1. The Defendants A, C and G co-principal defendants and G are not entitled to a building permit for the purpose of an individual workplace or factory within a development restriction zone, but can obtain a building permit for the purpose of a resident-sharing facility for village residents, taking advantage of the fact that they are allowed to obtain a building permit for the purpose of a common use facility for village residents, Defendant C prepared a false document in the name of the village conference and obtained a building permit for the use of the common use facility under the name of the farming association corporation I on the land of the subordinate city owned by the Defendant A, which

After March 5, 2014, G submitted a false business plan, articles of incorporation, general meeting minutes, etc. of "L Village Association" to K, which is a public official in charge of building permission, when filing an application for a construction permit for one of the first-class neighborhood living facilities for the use of the common ditch, which are Class I neighborhood living facilities of the area of the land owned by the farming association corporation I on the land of the Hanam-si, Hanam-si, which is a public official in charge of building permission. On April 18, 2014, G obtained a construction permit for the said warehouse from a public official in charge of building permission for the above warehouse, such as K, by misunderstanding that the above L Village Association intended to construct a common tunnel for community residents on the said land.

In this way, the Defendants conspired with G to interfere with the legitimate examination duties of public officials by fraudulent means, and obtained a building permit for the warehouse of this case by fraud or other improper means.

2. Defendant B and G’s co-principal Defendant and G are not entitled to a building permit for the use of an individual’s workplace or factory within a development-restricted zone, but a building permit for the use of a resident’s common use facility for village residents is granted. Defendant B and G’s wife N.