Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On July 2, 2013, around 18:20 on July 2, 2013, on the street side of the life zone in Gangnam-gu, Yecheon-si, the reason why the vehicle can not pass by parking on the street is that it received from the victim D(40 years of age and south) that it is the way to pass by, but it is not possible to park.

1. Defendant A, in the above date, at the above time and place, expressed that “I would have come to know if I would have come to do so,” Defendant A’s head part of the victim’s head, who was in front of the victim’s seated with the victim “I would have come to go to go to governance,” putting him with a deadly weapon or other dangerous things inside the vehicle, and she was 4 times remarkably fluencing the victim’s head part, where I am in front of the victim.

2. Defendant B, at the above date and place, reported that Defendant A was deprived of the victim at the above time and place, and, “I see this so, head is broken.” Defendant B, who cut off a deadly weapon or other dangerous object used by Defendant A, and threatened Defendant B with the victim, leading him to harming the victim, and harming her head.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. A of the pertinent legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 261 and 260(1)2 of the Criminal Act; Articles 284 and 283(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The Defendants recognized their mistakes and divided the sentencing reasons under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; each of the crimes of this case was contingent; each of the crimes of this case deposited KRW 500,000 for the victim; and the crimes of the Defendants were committed by using favorable circumstances, such as assaulting the victim’s head head part and threatening the victim’s head part, which is a dangerous object, and by using the expression that the head head is broken off; in the case of Defendant B, the crime was extremely poor; and the recidivism was committed during the suspended sentence period.