Defendant

In addition, all appeals filed by the person who requested the attachment order and the prosecutor are dismissed.

In light of the various sentencing conditions in this case, the sentence imposed by the court below (the execution of a sexual assault treatment program for 4 years and 120 hours) is too unreasonable, in light of the summary of the grounds for appeal.

In light of various sentencing conditions in this case, the sentence sentenced by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

It is unfair that the court below's improper exemption from disclosure and notification order is unfair to exempt the defendant from disclosure and notification order.

In light of the method and object of the Defendant’s crime of this case, the Defendant is likely to recommit a sexual crime.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which dismissed the defendant's request for an attachment order, is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the risk of recidivism, which affected the judgment.

Judgment

Examining the various sentencing conditions in the instant case regarding each of the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s respective arguments on sentencing, the following are favorable to the Defendant: (a) the Defendant was in the first instance, and all of the instant crimes appeared to be acceptable and contradictory; (b) the Defendant was an initial offender who has no record of criminal punishment; and (c) the Defendant must support the aged aged 70.

한편 이 사건 범행은, 피고인이 만 13세의 딸인 피해자가 잠을 자는 동안 피해자의 가슴과 성기를 만지고 입으로 성기를 핥는 등으로 피해자를 강제로 추행하고, 향정신의약품인 졸 피 뎀을 피해자에게 주어 복용하게 한 것으로, 범행의 동기, 방법 및 피고인과 피해자의 관계, 피해자의 나이 등에 비추어 죄질이 매우 불량하고 범정이 무거운 점, 피고인은 피해자가 올바르게 성장할 수 있도록 보호하고 양육하여야 할 아버지로서의 의무를 저버린 채 자신의 성적 욕구 만족을 위하여 이 사건 범행에 이르러 비난 가능성이 큰 점, 피해자는 믿고 의지하던...