Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged of this case is as follows: around 01:00 on April 9, 202, the defendant asked the victim D about whether the victim is in a relationship with E from the first room of the "C amusement shop" of the first floor of the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, about April 9, 202, and he knows that the victim recorded the situation at the time of the victim's cell phone.
having not recorded the recording;
“Acking the victim’s hand with sound, and cutting the victim’s cell phone cited by the victim, cutting the head of the victim’s cell phone in order to prevent the victim from cutting his/her cell phone, skeing the victim’s head, and cutting the victim’s face and the part of the victim’s neck.”
2. The instant case is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victim under paragraph (3) of the same Article.
In such a case, the victim submitted an application to the effect that he does not want to be punished against the defendant on January 21, 2021, which was after the prosecution of this case, and thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.