Of the judgment of the court below and the judgment of the court of second instance, each violation of the Immigration Control Act against the defendant, respectively.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. As to the violation of the Immigration Control Act by the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant on the grounds that there is no evidence of reinforcement of confessions, the statements made by the police of P, which stated that the defendant violated the Immigration Control Act in the attached Table 2 Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5 of the crime sight list No. 1, 4, and 5, are the statements made by the police in the attached Table No. 3 of the judgment of the court below, and each violation of the Employment Security Act No. 1 and No. 2 of the attached Table No. 3 of the crime sight list No. 1 and No. 2 in the judgment

B. 1) The first instance court: A fine of KRW 3 million: each crime of fraud as indicated in the lower court’s holding; two years of imprisonment; each violation of the Immigration Control Act; each violation of the Employment Security Act - a fine of KRW 5 million

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. The summary of the facts charged in this part of the charges is as follows: (a) Any person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall obtain the status of stay that allows a foreigner to engage in employment activities in the Republic of Korea, as prescribed by Presidential Decree, and shall not arrange or recommend the employment of a person who does not have the status of stay. Of January 2017, the Defendant shall not arrange or recommend the employment of 10 Thai Women on the AW AW located in Singu, AW Xma branch business, and the Defendant shall not allow a person who, despite being aware of the fact that one female of the Thailand, was not eligible to engage in employment activities for tourism and to engage in employment activities by 30 to 60,000 won for each person at the place of the same time from March 2017, to March 1, 2017, to refer the same as the list of crimes Nos. 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the employment of 10 Thai Women for the purpose of engaging in commercial sex acts or other obscene activities.

On May 2017, the Defendant entered two times as set forth in [Attachment 3] Nos. 3 and 4 of the List of Offenses.