logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.09.25 2014가단133731
소유권이전등기
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff’s share of 1.5/23,882 out of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 15,788.4 square meters, the Defendant shall attach on July 11, 2003.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

(a) Recognition 1) Co., Ltd. 3 around 1983 F, an aggregate building on the land, Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D and E (the name of the above lot number and apartment is based on the current certified copy of the register;

2) On December 28, 1993, the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the defendant was completed on the real estate listed in the [Attachment] among F (hereinafter “instant building”).

3) On February 18, 1992, the replotting procedure has been completed for the land which is the object of the site ownership of the building of this case, and thereby a change of indication about F has been completed. However, the land which is the object of the site ownership is the land of this case, which is the land of this case, the land of this case is the land of this case in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu

) 1.5/23,882 shares in the instant land (hereinafter referred to as “instant shares”).

(4) On the other hand, on December 28, 1993, the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the defendant was completed.

5. On June 1, 2003, the defendant sold the building of this case to the plaintiff, and the same year.

7. 11. The registration of ownership transfer was completed in the future of the plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 7, purport of the whole pleadings

B. The instant land is an aggregate building F’s site (Article 2 subparag. 5 of the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings), and the ownership of the instant land owned by the Defendant to own the instant building, which is an exclusive ownership, is the right to use the site.

(Article 2 subparag. 6 of the same Act). However, the right to use a site by a sectional owner is in accordance with the disposition of his section for exclusive use (Article 20(1) of the same Act), and the Plaintiff who purchased the building of this case from the Defendant, along with his section for exclusive use, shall also acquire the right

(2) The Plaintiff, etc., on September 11, 2008, bears the responsibility for the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of the acquisition of the part of exclusive ownership of the instant building on September 11, 2003. Thus, the Defendant shall implement the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of the acquisition of the part of exclusive ownership of the instant building.

arrow