logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.07.03 2014고단3764
미성년자유인
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at Seoul High Court on February 10, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 17th of the same month.

【Criminal Facts】

On June 2014, the Defendants met the victim G (Woo, 14 years old), victim H (Woo, 13 years old), victim I (Woo, 14 years old) at the convenience store located in the ASEAN-si, Jeollabuk-do, Seoul Special Self-Governing Province, and Defendant A and victim G exchanged contact numbers with each other.

Defendant

B around July 7, 2014, Defendant A called Defendant A to work for the said victims, and Defendant A called the victim G, and called the victim G, “A will pay KRW 100,000 won per hour, KRW 100,000 per day, KRW 700,000 per week, and KRW 700,000 per week.” The victim G transferred the victim I and the victim H, and Defendant A continued to transfer the bus to the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government high-speed terminal where there is no bus that the victim would go to the Gangnam-gu high-speed terminal.

On July 8, 2014, around 02:00 on July 8, 2014, the Defendants sent a vehicle (J) to the Gangseo-do branch of Gangwon-do in order to take the victims into custody, let the victims take aboard the vehicle in the vicinity of the Seoul High Speed Terminal, and let the victims go back to the frequency of the light, and let the victims do the signboard business. On the same day, at around 16:30 of the same day, the Defendants moved to the "K Minh" located in the "K Minh" located in the Seocho-si, and left it as soon as possible for the victims, and made the victims move together with the Defendants until the victims are dismissed by the mother of the victim I.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to induce the victims who are minors.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s statement in the second trial record;

1. Each protocol of the police statement concerning G, I, H and L;

1. A previous conviction in judgment:

arrow