Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the business of driving vehicles in the B Poter II Freeboard.

On November 7, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 10:25 on November 7, 2016, and operated the vehicle into the shooting range of the Siknam-gu, Seoul, the main lane of the Guknam-gu, Seoul, with the two-lanes between the two-lanes in the Guknam-gu, and the direction of the Siknam-do.

A person engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care to maintain the safety distance with the previous one and to ensure the safe operation of the motor vehicle by parking the motor vehicle at a safe place, making a sufficient rest, and safely operating the motor vehicle. Since there are vehicles located at the time, there was a fixed vehicle, so there was a duty of care to maintain the safety distance with the previous one, display the steering gear, and accurately operate the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, due to the negligence of driving on a roadside, when he stops in front of the vehicle at the front of the vehicle due to the driver’s negligence, went to the front part of the victim C(51) driving of the victim C(51) driving which was parked in front of the vehicle at the front of the vehicle. The Defendant left the front part of the victim E(39 years old) driving on the front of the vehicle due to the shock and the front part of the driver’s vehicle, which was pushing ahead of the vehicle at the front of the vehicle due to the shock. The Defendant left the front part of the vehicle by driving the vehicle at the front of the vehicle while driving the vehicle at the front of the vehicle at the front of the vehicle. The Defendant left the front part of the victim’s G driving which was driven in front of the vehicle at the front of the vehicle at the end of the vehicle at the front of the vehicle. By the shock, the Defendant left the front part of the vehicle by driving the vehicle at the front of the victim’s vehicle at the front of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks’ treatment due to occupational negligence as above, and injury to the victim E, such as brain salvins, etc. requiring approximately two weeks’ treatment. At the same time, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C.