1. The Defendant’s KRW 39,600,000 as well as 6% per annum from September 1, 2014 to January 5, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including the number of pages), the plaintiff entered into a service contract with the defendant for technical advice and advice to obtain the renewal certification of the electric utility industry technology standards (Kori Eletric Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc Posc s

Therefore, barring special circumstances, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 39,60,000 for service costs under the instant service contract (including value-added tax) and the amount calculated at the rate of 6% per annum under the Commercial Act from September 1, 2014 following the expiration date of the instant service contract to January 5, 2015, which was served on the Defendant by the original copy of the instant payment order, and 20% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the day of full payment, so it is so decided as per Disposition.