logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.21 2014고단9045
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a Fland passenger car.

On October 24, 2014, at around 23:26, the Defendant made a turn to the left according to one-lane of the Gyeonggi-gu Seoul Samsungdong 52-7, the shooting distance of the four-lane from the Cheongstrostrostal distance room to the left.

Since there is a place where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive the driver in accordance with the signals by checking the front, left, and signal well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the left-hand part of the H driving G(26 years old) left-hand part of the Defendant’s driving car in front of the driver’s car, which was driven by the straight-out signal at the right-hand turn by negligence, disregarding that the vehicle driving signal is a two-way driving signal and in contravention of the signal.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim, such as the upper-class pelke and pelvis pelvis lafing on the left-hand side in need of approximately nine weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. G statements;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection fine of punishment (such as the fact that the victim has agreed smoothly with the victim, the fact that there is no previous conviction or more than the suspension of execution, the fact that the motor vehicle comprehensive insurance has been subscribed, and the fact that the crime is committed against the victim

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow