logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.04.05 2017가단107283
양수금
Text

1. The plaintiff

A. Defendant B Co., Ltd.: (a) from July 12, 2007 to September 30, 2015, as well as KRW 49,000.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

The Defendant Company B (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) and G filed a lawsuit against the Defendant Company B (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) for the claim for the amount of transfer under the Busan District Court 2007Gahap8108, and the above court rendered a judgment on August 16, 2007 to the I, the Defendant Company, the Defendant Company, the amount of KRW 484,33,570, and the amount of KRW 106,135,112, and the amount of KRW 20% per annum from July 12, 2007 to the date of full payment, and the judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

(hereinafter “instant final and conclusive judgment”). On August 26, 201, the Financial Services Commission rendered a decision to transfer I pursuant to Article 14(2) of the Act on the Structural Improvement of the Financial Industry, designating the Plaintiff as the company that takes over the contracts, and publicly announced the said decision on August 29, 201 in daily newspapers. Accordingly, the Plaintiff acquired the instant final and conclusive payment claim from I.

G was deceased on May 7, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”), and as the bereaved family members of the deceased, the Defendant C and his/her spouse, J, K, and F.

Defendant C reported each renunciation of inheritance (No. 2012-S. Family Court 2012-S. 1395), J, K, and F respectively, and each report was accepted.

On the other hand, L is L is a child of J, and F is a child of Defendant D, and L is an inheritance limited approval (Seoul Family Court 2018 Maz.1236), and Defendant D reported the renunciation of inheritance (Seoul Family Court 2018 Maz.1664) and each report was accepted.

[Reasons for Recognition] According to the facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 2-2, Eul evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 1-2, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the above facts of recognition as to the purport of the whole pleadings, the plaintiff was acquired by transfer from I the defendant company and deceased's claim for the final judgment amount of this case.

On the other hand, according to the renunciation of inheritance by J, K, F, and L, Defendant D, a lineal descendant of the deceased, is the first heir.

arrow