1. Attached Form among the instant lawsuit

1. Of the details of taxation disposition, the term “additional dues” from May 20, 2015 to June 15, 2015 is as follows.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. (1) B, etc. obtained permission from the head of the Suwon-si District, on February 20, 2006, for development activities for the purpose of the site creation project for Class I neighborhood living facilities (retail stores) with respect to the land (retail stores) and C, D, and E, from the head of the Suwon-si District, for the purpose of the development activities. After all, the purpose of the permission was to change the site creation project for Class I neighborhood living facilities (a dental clinic and retail store) into “the first project (a project).”

Since then, in the area where the above development activities are permitted, the "Yanman City E land was added," and the purpose was changed to "the first-class neighborhood living facilities (Korean Council members, resting restaurants, and gymnasiums) site creation project (hereinafter "the second-class project project")".

B. Following the registration conversion and division after the permission for each of the above development activities, the land in Yongsan-si District C was “YY, H, I, J, K, and L land, etc.,” and the land in Yongsan-si District D was “YYM, N, and O land, etc.,” and the land in Yongsan-si E became “YYYYY, P, Q, etc.,” respectively.

(hereinafter referred to as the “land after each of the instant divisions” in total, including registration conversion and divided land.

B, with respect to the instant project No. 1, and F, etc. withdrawn an application for permission for each development activity regarding the instant project No. 2, and the Defendant accepted the said application on September 16, 2013 and revoked permission for each of the instant projects.

Meanwhile, as of September 16, 2013, the Plaintiff owned each of the instant land, excluding the instant land owned by the Plaintiff, among the land after each of the instant land was divided, G, and O (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant land”), and R owned each of the instant land after each of the instant land was divided.

E. The Defendant on April 17, 2014.