logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2013.08.29 2013고정825
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 22:40 on December 28, 2012, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (if the Defendant was under the influence of at least 0.098% of blood alcohol level on the 826 occup-dong, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Jinyang-si, and proceeded to the occup-dong at the speed of 0.098% from the 826 occup-dong, and was under the influence of at least 0.09% of blood alcohol level, while entering the road to go to the occup-dong at the right side of the day, without checking the front and rear left right of the drunk-gu, while driving the road as it was under the influence of the Defendant, the Defendant shocked the part that was under the influence of the victim C (the age of 40) who was running to the above access road first due to the occupational negligence.

As above, the Defendant, as a result of an accident caused by the traffic of a vehicle, escaped without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the car and checking the damage caused by the damage to the repair cost of KRW 489,925 by means of the exchange of the latter pans, etc.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) provided that the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.098% from a section of about 800 meters, where it is difficult to find out whether it was flick-dong, Yongsan-gu, Soyang-gu, Soyang-si, Soyang-si, SKKK KK KK station, in a manner of under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of at least 0.098%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148, Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148, 54 (2) 3, 148-2 (2) 3, and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines for each crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow