logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.04.20 2017구합69748
출연금환수 및 참여제한처분 취소 청구의소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 20, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement on the project for industrial technology innovation (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with the Defendant to which the Defendant was solely responsible agency, the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff Company E (hereinafter “E”) as participating parties with respect to the instant task (hereinafter “instant task”). The total implementation period and agreement period from December 1, 2013 to September 30, 2016, respectively, concluded the agreement on the project for industrial technology innovation (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

The contents of the instant agreement relating to the instant case are as follows.

The previous first year of technology development project expenses (from December 1, 2013 to September 30, 2014), the second year (from October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015) of the second year (from September 1, 2015 to September 30, 2015), combined government contributions of KRW 350 million, KRW 370 million, KRW 300,000,000, KRW 340,000,000, KRW 13,000,000, KRW 300,000,000, KRW 13,000,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 13,000,000, KRW 300,000,000, KRW 13,000,000,000, KRW 17,17,017,000,000.

Article 6 (Reporting on Results of Technology Development and Evaluation) (1) The managing agency shall submit a performance report, annual report, stage report, next stage plan, final report, performance utilization status report, etc. to the agency vested with exclusive responsibility within the deadline prescribed in the relevant statutes and regulations under Article 16.

(2) Detailed matters concerning the procedures and criteria for review and evaluation of reports submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) and subsequent procedures therefor shall be as prescribed by the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes and provisions of Article 16.

Article 9 (Modification of the Convention) (1) A specialized institution, a major institution, or a participating institution may amend the details of the agreement of this case and the project plan thereof in accordance with relevant statutes and regulations under Article 16 or 16.

(2) An exclusively responsible agency shall, upon request of a major institution or:

arrow