A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

Punishment of the crime

1. [2019 Highest 2322] around 04:30 on April 15, 2019, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol in the Ccafeteria located in Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, demanded packaging of the victim D, “I will not find why I would find why I would find why I would have any why I would find it?” and demanded packaging of his cell phone device, and interfere with the victim’s restaurant business by force for about one hour by smoking the disturbance, such as cutting off the boom while I would like to take off the main body.

2. [Attachment 2019 Highest 2421] On May 26, 2019, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s main store business by force for about 10 minutes, by putting the table table, which is located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, in his/her hand, by cutting off the table table, cutting off the table table, and taking a bath for him/her.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, criminal land, and investigation reports (on-site CCTV reading);

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. From among concurrent offenders, the sentence for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act is for the reason of the sentencing [the scope of recommending punishment] Part 1 (Interference with Business) and Part 2 (including any effort to recover damage) in the mitigation area (one to eight months) [the scope of recommending punishment] and the mitigation area (one to one month) [the scope of recommending punishment] and the mitigation area (one to eight months) [including any effort to recover damage] and the reduction area (one to one month): The final sentencing scope according to the aggravation of multiple crimes: one month to one year [the sentence], while the defendant is under suspension of execution due to assault, etc., the defendant again is under suspension of execution and is being sentenced to punishment for a separate crime, and currently in the Supreme Court at the present time, it seems that the same criminal defendant repeats the error and requires strict punishment.