logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.08.13 2019가단49350
명도 및 임차료 청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the buildings listed in the separate sheet (second floor), each point of the attached sheet Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 as to the cause of the claim and the whole arguments, the plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the defendant on May 6, 2019, stipulating that on May 25, 2019, the lease deposit amount of KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,0000,000,0000,000,000,0000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000.

According to the above facts, the lease contract of this case was lawfully terminated by the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate of this case to the plaintiff, and to pay unjust enrichment calculated by the ratio of KRW 50,000 per month from March 25, 2020 to the completion date of delivery of the real estate of this case to KRW 950,00 ( KRW 50,000,000,000).

2. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable.

arrow