1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 21, 2019, the Plaintiff was diagnosed on February 21, 2019 as a person who has worked in the mining center.

B. On April 3, 2019, the Plaintiff asserted that the instant injury and disease occurred due to the performance of duties at a remote workplace with a large volume of 12 years and 5 months, and filed an application for medical care benefits. However, on April 3, 2019, the Defendant rendered a decision not to grant medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff for the following reasons.

On February 27, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the same assertion. On June 5, 2017, the “written reply as a result of the deliberation on whether an occupational disease,” which had been interviewed and deliberated by the research institute at the time, had been subject to a disposition of non-approval by the Plaintiff as follows: (a) on June 5, 2017, the first first rate, which is less than 70% for the engine expansion, was less than the first rate of 1st century for the f2% of the normal predicted values after the f2% of the normal predicted values; and (b) even if the first amount was 62% of the normal predicted values, the Plaintiff had been subject to a disposition of gas exposure to coal and the determined glass dust and nitrogen oxides during the blasting and blasting work, which were generated from the year 38 years of age from August 1984.

An application for medical care benefits submitted this time is confirmed as the same assertion as at the time of non-approval without submitting objective data, etc. to verify the additional ability.

As above, the contents of the plaintiff's request, the relevant statutes, and the response reports on the results of deliberation as to whether the plaintiff's application for the disease occurred, and it is determined that the injury or disease of this case, which is the injury or disease of this case, is not related to the work

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion shall perform the work of coal, digging, and transporting sources in coal mines for about 12 years and six months, and a large quantity of coal with high concentration.