All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. On the grounds of appeal by the Prosecutor, the lower court acquitted the Prosecutor on each of the instant charges on the ground that there was no proof of crime regarding each of the instant charges.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the criminal intent of deception and deception in fraud, or by violating the principle of substantial direct cross-examination.

2. As to the Defendant’s grounds of appeal, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of embezzlement of one point out of the instant facts charged, on the grounds as indicated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing

In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed on the defendant, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.