beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 14, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for one year for fraud in the Suwon District Court Ansan branch on July 14, 2010 and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 22, 2010.
1. The defrauded did not have any particular property, and the amount of personal card loan was about 11 million won, and the former investors failed to pay interest and principal to the former investors, and even if he did not receive money from the victims, he did not have any way to recover the loan at a different place, he did not have any intent or ability to return the interest which the victims promised to pay, or to return the principal.
Nevertheless, during the period of Ansan-si on August 29, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E operated by the victim D who was in the Gu C, stating that “The Defendant would pay the victim with high interest on the loan to other persons, and if the Defendant would pay the money to B, he will pay interest at an amount exceeding 20% of the principal amount in one month.”
As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 35 million from the victim as the head of the Tong, and acquired it by deception, and in the same manner, acquired KRW 128.9 million in total five times, as shown in the attached Table 1, as the victim’s list of crimes, and acquired it as investment money from the victims.
2. Around November 11, 2008, the Defendant forged private documents, using the Korean language program at the G office located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, prepared a document stating “Japan 20,000,000, interest KRW 4,000,000, September 23, 2008, the debtor, and joint and several sureties,” and printed it into the paper A4, using a computer program located therein, and then drawn up six copies of H’s loan certificate using the same method as indicated in the attached list 2.
This is the defendant.