logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.29 2017가합505181
임시주주총회결의부존재확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is a company established on January 25, 2007 for the purpose of film production, distribution, export and import business, etc., and the Plaintiff is a shareholder who holds shares issued by the Defendant 100%.

The Defendant’s trade name was changed to “stock company D” on August 10, 2016, and changed to the current trade name on January 9, 2017.

B. On August 2016, while the Plaintiff was in office as the representative director of the Defendant, the Plaintiff agreed to transfer the right of management to the Intervenor joining the Defendant’s co-litigation (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) and E.

The intervenor had been employed as the employee of the defendant since May 2, 2012.

The chairperson of the bill bill bill bill bill bill bill bill bill bill bill bill bill No. 4 (specific omission of the contents) No. 2 of the bill bill bill bill bill bill bill bill No. 3 of the case (specific omission of the contents) bill bill bill bill bill bill bill bill No. 4 of the case (specific omission of the contents) explain the current articles of incorporation to comply with the business purpose and the commercial law and the tax law, and explain the necessity of the complete amendment of the articles of incorporation to comply with the whole articles of incorporation.

A. 1: The chairperson of the case of the enactment of the provision on the payment of compensation for executive officers, retirement allowances for executive officers, compensation for bereaved families, etc. under the provisions of Article 51 of the revised articles of association shall explain the necessity to make separate rules under the provisions of Article 51 of the Regulations on the Payment of Remuneration for Executive Officers, the Regulations on the Payment of Retirement Allowances for Executive Officers, and the Regulations on the Payment of Survivors' Compensation for Executive Officers, and shall ask the intent of the tin shareholder for the newly established provisions, and shall be approved by the unanimous order

Appendix 1: A separate table 2: A separate table 3: A separate table of the retirement allowance payment regulations for officers: A separate table of compensation for survivors, etc. of executives;

C. On August 9, 2016, the Plaintiff affixed a seal and affixed a seal on the minutes of the special shareholders’ meeting on a total of two pages, stating the following:

However, the date on which the minutes are prepared is indicated as August 10, 2016.

Accordingly, the plaintiff is dismissed from office on August 10, 2016.

arrow