Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The criminal defendant against the victim B is in the D cafeteria operated by the defendant in Thai City from March to April, 2011, to the victim B, and the victim B needs to “it is difficult to present and have a cost of living or a cost of operating.”
When a person lends money, he/she shall be provided with the payment of the time limit.
“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, in fact, the Defendant, at the time, was obligated to pay the amount of 20 million won to the New Cooperatives, H, 15 million won, and 40 million won, with a large amount of obligation to pay interest, and was planned to prevent the so-called return of interest or principal to other persons by receiving money from the injured party, and even if the extended amount was to be repaid, there was no intention or ability to pay the amount even if he/she borrowed money from the injured party.
The Defendant received a total of KRW 8 million from the injured party, including KRW 2 million from March to April, 2011, KRW 1 million from June 201, KRW 2000,000 around January 201, KRW 2000,000 around January 201, KRW 1 million from April 201 to May 5, 201, and KRW 2 million from June 7, 2012.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
2. On May 20, 2013, the Defendant against the victim E is a victim’s “G main store” operated by the victim E, who is located in Thai City F on May 20, 2013, and the said victim is a party’s share of KRW 5 million out of the subsidies, and one of which is a loan of KRW 4 million out of which will be repaid later.
“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, in fact, the Defendant, at the time, was liable for a large amount of loan of KRW 20 million to the New Cooperatives, H, KRW 15 million, and KRW 40 million, with a large amount of obligation to pay interest to many other persons, and was thought to prevent the so-called return of interest or principal to other persons by receiving money from the injured party. Thus, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the interest even if he borrowed money from the injured party.
The Defendant received 4 million won in cash from the damaged party.
This is the defendant.