1. The Defendant: KRW 34,916,155 for the Plaintiff, and KRW 5% per annum from July 9, 2015 to May 3, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a company engaged in vessel vessel processing, PEP painting and construction design business. 2) The Defendant is a company engaged in automobile parts, vessel parts manufacturing business, etc.

The original trade name of the defendant was C, and was changed to the current trade name on January 19, 2015.

B. A contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant 1) Around November 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a contract with the following terms (hereinafter “instant factory use contract”).

(2) The Defendant provided the Plaintiff with all equipment necessary for the entirety of the Defendant’s factory building and painting construction, and the Plaintiff performs all of the painting construction work. The Plaintiff is paid 70% of the construction cost that was undertaken by the said method, and 30% of the Defendant. 2) The Plaintiff occupied the Defendant’s factory building from November 25, 2014 to the Defendant’s factory building, and the Plaintiff or the Defendant performed the contracted painting construction work.

C. Construction details of the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s construction work are as follows: (a) the construction work conducted by the Plaintiff using equipment, including the shock bags provided by the Defendant and the Defendant.

The fact that the plaintiff's construction cost (including cost and value added tax) of the painting C-D (including cost and value added tax) 13,308,900 SUMT 120,064,500 SUMT 16,79,792,930 totaled 143,952,439 Co., Ltd. (including cost and value added tax) of the orderer 6,974,770 Co., Ltd. 17,457,457,54 and total sum of 184,432,314 Co., Ltd. 17,45,57,544 and the sum of the construction cost (including cost and value added tax) of the painting C-D (including cost and value added tax), 308,900, 11,396, 181, 408, 258, 308, 300

2. Determination

(a) dispute between the Parties;