logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2014.11.27 2014고단363
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 6, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for eight months in the Cheongju District Court for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 30, 2014.

Although the defendant had purchased insurance products in his/her own name, he/she had received false hospitalized treatment, and submitted a written claim for insurance proceeds, a written confirmation of release from entering into a contract, etc., thereby deceiving an insurance company to receive insurance proceeds.

On October 4, 200, the Defendant paid KRW 30,000 per day to 30 days of hospitalization for more than 3 days sold by the Korea Life Insurance Co., Ltd.; KRW 80,000 per day from 30 days to 120 days; KRW 1,00,000 per day from 30 days to 120 days; KRW 1,00,000 per day from 21 days of hospitalization; and KRW 3,00,000 in a lump sum from 3,00,000 when an adult disease was performed; and around December 6, 200, the Defendant subscribed to the Korea Life Insurance Co., Ltd. (U. 30,000 per day of hospitalization for more than 3 days; KRW 30,000 per day from 30 days to 20,00 per day from 30 days of the disaster; and subscribed to the Korea Life Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Disaster”).

Around April 29, 2011, even though there was no need to receive hospitalized treatment in the Dental surgery located in the Hacheon-si, Chungcheongbuk-si, the Defendant actively complained of the symptoms of epidemebrate and urine diseases, and requested hospitalization from the same year from the date on which the Defendant requested hospitalization.

5. By December 12, 198, hospitalization was made for 14 days.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not use most of the urology, etc. during the period of hospitalization, which was prescribed by a doctor, and did not receive hospital treatment such as arbitrarily taking urcology outside urcology in the hospital.

Nevertheless, around May 23, 2011, the Defendant claimed insurance money for the above two insurances against the Korea Life Insurance Co., Ltd. with the Defendant as the beneficiary on May 23, 2011, and that the above two insurances are appropriate for hospital treatment from the above victim.

5.25 Insurance proceeds around 140.

arrow