logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2012.10.25 2012도9663
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Seoul Northern District Court Panel Division.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Article 5-3(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes provides that “When a driver of an accident runs away without taking measures under Article 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act, such as aiding a victim or a police officer, etc.” refers to cases where the driver of an accident leaves the scene of the accident before fulfilling his/her duty under Article 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act, such as aiding a victim, although he/she knew of the fact that the victim was killed or injured, resulting in a situation in which it is impossible to determine who caused the accident. The purpose of Article 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act is to prevent and eliminate traffic danger and impediments that occur on the road and ensure safe and smooth traffic flow. In such cases, measures to be taken by the driver shall be considered to be necessary in light of the substance and degree of damages of the accident, and such measures shall be included in the calculation of his/her life and identity, but the provision of Article 5-3(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the driver of the traffic accident shall be subject to protect his/her personal and ethical interests.

arrow