The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On February 13, 2017, from around 19:30 to 19:50 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by putting the victim’s restaurant in a large box, such as having the victim D, working for the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (E); (b) having two drinking persons drink with one another, drinking alcohol with one another while drinking alcohol; and (c) shouldering the drinking with one another; and (d) taking the chair with one another; and (c) having the customer go to the restaurant, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. 판단 살피건대, 피해자 D은 이 법정에 증인으로 출석하여 피고인이 언성을 높이고 넘어져 있는 의자를 툭툭 발로 찬 것 같은데, 의도적으로 찼는지 여부에 대해서는 잘 모르고, 테이블을 엎은 사람은 피고인이 아니라 다른 일행인 것 같다는 취지로 진술하는 점, 증인 F도 당시 테이블을 밀치거나 의자를 던진 사람이 피고인 인지에 대해서는 잘 모르겠다고 진술하는 점 등에 비추어, 검찰에서 제출한 증거들 만으로는 피고인이 위와 같은 소란을 피웠다는 점에 관하여 합리적 의심의 여지 없이 증명되었다고 인정하기에 부족하고, 달리 이를 인정할 증거가 없다.

3. In conclusion, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of a crime, a judgment of innocence is rendered after the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act and the defendant does not consent to a public notice of acquittal, and thus, the public notice of the judgment of innocence is not ordered under the proviso of Article 58(2) of the Criminal Act.