1. The Defendant terminated the title trust on September 14, 2012 with respect to the share of each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff.

Since the defendant, as a clan, did not have the substance of the clan as a clan, the lawsuit of this case is unlawful.

According to the evidence Nos. 1-1, 2, and 2 of Eul evidence Nos. 1-2, C, the plaintiff's representative, against the defendant on March 20, 2004 as the representative of D'D', which is the court 2004Kadan2281 (hereinafter "First Lawsuit"), for the same cause of claim as this case, filed a lawsuit for the execution of the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of the same claim. C in the first lawsuit, D's class D's 18 grandchildren, F's 18 descendants, which is the city of E, and each real estate listed in the separate list No. 200, is owned in D's class D', and it is difficult to view that the plaintiff filed a lawsuit for the execution of the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer for the reason of the cancellation of title trust with the defendant 20, which is the first instance court's 207 years old and later the first lawsuit for the alteration of the common time of D's 26 years old and 205.15 years old.25.25

However, the unique meaning of clans is naturally created by descendants of the common ancestor for the purpose of protecting the graves of the ancestor and promoting friendship between their descendants and their descendants.